{"id":138587,"date":"2026-03-23T13:09:08","date_gmt":"2026-03-23T13:09:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/23\/solana-strikes-90-will-this-rebound-lead-sol-price-to-100-or-face-resistance-at-95\/"},"modified":"2026-03-23T13:09:08","modified_gmt":"2026-03-23T13:09:08","slug":"solana-strikes-90-will-this-rebound-lead-sol-price-to-100-or-face-resistance-at-95","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/23\/solana-strikes-90-will-this-rebound-lead-sol-price-to-100-or-face-resistance-at-95\/","title":{"rendered":"Solana Strikes $90: Will This Rebound Lead SOL Price to $100 or Face Resistance at $95?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The post Solana Strikes $90: Will This Rebound Lead SOL Price to $100 or Face Resistance at $95?<\/a> appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News<\/a><\/p>\n

Solana price<\/a> has staged a modest recovery after a sharp pullback, but the price continues to struggle below a key resistance zone, keeping the broader structure range-bound. While market conditions have slightly improved, SOL remains capped under the $92 level, preventing a confirmed bullish breakout.<\/p>\n

The current setup suggests that the recent bounce may not be enough to shift momentum. Instead, the price appears to be consolidating within a defined range, raising the possibility of another move toward lower support levels before any sustained recovery begins.<\/p>\n

With the $80 zone emerging as a crucial demand area, the next move could determine whether Solana sets the stage for a stronger rebound toward $100 or continues to trade within the existing range.<\/p>\n

Solana Price Analysis: Range Breakdown Risk Builds Below $92 Resistance<\/h2>\n

Solana continues to trade within a well-defined range, with the price repeatedly facing rejection near the $92 resistance zone. Despite recent recovery attempts, bulls have failed to secure a breakout, keeping the price action capped within the range. The chart highlights a prolonged consolidation phase, where SOL has been forming a base between $92 and $68, indicating a balance between buyers and sellers. <\/p>\n

However, the recent rejection near the upper boundary suggests weakening bullish momentum.<\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

The RSI is incremental, while the MACD is still bearish, which suggests the buying pressure has not mounted yet. With this, the possibility of a rejection may remain higher with the price heading back to the support. <\/p>\n

Structure & Key Zones<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Resistance: $92<\/li>\n
  • Range Low \/ Major Support: $68<\/li>\n
  • Mid-Range Support: $80\u2013$82 (demand zone)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    The highlighted zone around $80 emerges as a critical area, aligning with your thesis of a potential liquidity sweep. A move toward this level could act as a reset, allowing stronger hands to accumulate before a possible rebound.<\/p>\n

    What Comes Next?<\/h3>\n

    If Solana price fails to reclaim $92, the probability of a pullback toward the $80 support zone increases. This level is likely to attract buying interest and could act as a trigger point for a relief rally.<\/p>\n

    However, if $80 fails to hold, the downside could extend toward the $68 range low, which remains the key structural support. On the upside, only a decisive breakout above $92 would invalidate the current range-bound structure and open the path toward $100 and higher levels.<\/p>\n

    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The post Solana Strikes $90: Will This Rebound Lead SOL Price to $100 or…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":138588,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-stocks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138587\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/138588"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americansecuritiesanalytics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}