Stablecoin Rewards Banned? White House Moves to Finalize Crypto Rules by March 1

The post Stablecoin Rewards Banned? White House Moves to Finalize Crypto Rules by March 1 appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

A draft bill circulating in Washington signals that the crypto industry is heading toward its most decisive regulatory moment yet.

The document, labeled as a Senate discussion draft for the 119th Congress, outlines a framework to regulate the offer and sale of digital commodities under the oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It is still early stage, but the direction is clear: federal agencies are preparing to define who controls crypto markets and how stablecoins can operate.

Now, the White House has reportedly set a March 1 deadline to push the broader crypto market structure bill forward. And one major issue has already been settled.

No Yield on Idle Stablecoin Balances

The central decision goes directly against crypto firms and stablecoin holders. Under the current draft language discussed in meetings this week, companies will not be allowed to offer rewards simply for holding stablecoins.

That means the savings account style yield model is effectively off the table.

The debate has narrowed. Lawmakers are now considering whether rewards could be allowed only when tied to specific structured activities, such as lending or other defined financial use. Passive yield for idle balances appears to be a red line.

The White House reportedly led the meeting directly, presenting draft text and guiding the conversation. Major crypto players including Coinbase and Ripple were in the room, alongside venture firm a16z and industry trade groups. Banks participated through national banking associations, signaling that traditional finance is deeply invested in the outcome.

Enforcement Power and Heavy Penalties

The draft would grant enforcement authority to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Treasury Department, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Penalties for violating the idle yield ban could reach up to $500,000 per violation per day. That scale of enforcement shows the administration wants to shut down any attempt to replicate deposit like products through stablecoins without regulatory approval.

Banks are still pushing for a formal deposit outflow study. Their concern is straightforward. If payment stablecoins become widely adopted, consumers might move funds out of traditional bank deposits. That could reduce banks’ lending capacity and reshape the credit system.

The Bigger Picture: Market Structure Clarity

Despite the stablecoin yield setback, many in crypto still see the broader bill as constructive.

The legislation aims to create clearer rules around custody, exchange oversight, token classification, and the division of authority between the SEC and the CFTC. For years, uncertainty over whether tokens are securities or commodities has slowed institutional adoption.

A formal framework could change that.

Clear definitions would reduce regulatory risk, potentially unlocking long term capital from institutional investors who have stayed cautious due to unclear enforcement standards.

The discussion draft shown in the image signals that Congress is preparing a structured approach rather than piecemeal enforcement. Titles referencing definitions and rulemaking suggest a comprehensive framework is being built.

.article-inside-link {
margin-left: 0 !important;
border: 1px solid #0052CC4D;
border-left: 0;
border-right: 0;
padding: 10px 0;
text-align: left;
}

.entry ul.article-inside-link li {
font-size: 14px;
line-height: 21px;
font-weight: 600;
list-style-type: none;
margin-bottom: 0;
display: inline-block;
}

.entry ul.article-inside-link li:last-child {
display: none;
}

• Also Read :
•   Ripple CEO Says Clarity Act Has 90% Chance of Passing
•   ,

Why This Matters for Crypto Markets

The yield ban could pressure stablecoin issuers that relied on rewards to attract users. At the same time, regulatory clarity could strengthen larger players that can operate within tighter compliance standards.

For crypto markets, this is a trade off moment.

On one side, restrictions on idle stablecoin rewards limit a popular incentive model. On the other, a clear federal framework could reduce enforcement risk, bring regulatory stability, and open the door to broader institutional participation.

Talks are continuing this week. If negotiators reach agreement by the end of the month, the framework could formally advance by March 1.

The stablecoin yield fight may be nearing its endgame. And once that blocker is cleared, Washington appears ready to move the full crypto market structure bill to the next stage.

FAQs